4.5 Article

Soil Organic Carbon is Increased in Mixed-Species Plantations of Eucalyptus and Nitrogen-Fixing Acacia

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 123-132

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-012-9600-9

Keywords

soil carbon sequestration; organic matter fractionation; decomposition; nitrogen fixation

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil organic carbon (soil C) sequestration in forests is often higher under nitrogen (N-2)-fixing than under non-N-2-fixing tree species. Here, we examined whether soil C could be increased using mixed-species plantations compared to monocultures, which are less productive aboveground than mixtures. In addition, we compared soil C sequestration under N-2-fixing trees with non-N-2-fixing trees that received N fertilizer. Monocultures of Eucalyptus globulus (E) and the N-2-fixing Acacia mearnsii (A) and mixtures of these species were planted in a replacement series: 100%E, 75%E + 25%A, 50%E + 50%A, 25%E + 75%A and 100%A. Soil samples were also collected from fertilized monoculture treatments (100%EFer) of E. globulus (250 kg N ha(-1)). Total organic C, N and phosphorus were determined at age 8 years at two soil depths (0-10 cm and 10-30 cm) and three density fractions of soil organic matter (SOM) were quantified for 0-5 cm depth. Soil C was highest in the 50%E + 50%A mixed stand and was highly correlated with aboveground biomass, not to the percentage of A. mearnsii in mixtures. This was largely due to soil C at 10-30 cm because there were no treatment effects on soil C at 0-10 cm. All density fractions of SOM at 0-5 cm increased with the percentage of A. mearnsii. In E. globulus monocultures, N fertilization did not increase soil C when compared with unfertilized stands. These results indicate that the inclusion of N-2-fixing trees into eucalypt plantations may increase soil C stocks through increased productivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available