4.5 Article

Biomass, Litter, and Soil Respiration Along a Precipitation Gradient in Southern Great Plains, USA

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1369-1380

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-009-9296-7

Keywords

biomass; grassland; litter mass; precipitation gradient; soil carbon; soil respiration

Categories

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB 0078325, DEB 0444518]
  2. Terrestrial Carbon Program at the Office of Science
  3. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-006ER64317]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of how ecosystem carbon (C) processes respond to variations in precipitation is crucial for assessing impacts of climate change on terrestrial ecosystems. In this study, we examined variations of shoot and root biomass, standing and surface litter, soil respiration, and soil C content along a natural precipitation gradient from 430 to 1200 mm in the southern Great Plains, USA. Our results show that shoot biomass and soil respiration increased linearly with mean annual precipitation (MAP), whereas root biomass and soil C content remained relatively constant along the precipitation gradient. Consequently, the root/shoot ratio linearly decreased with MAP. However, patterns of standing, surface, and total litter mass followed quadratic relationships with MAP along the gradient, likely resulting from counterbalance between litter production and decomposition. Those linear/quadratic equations describing variations of ecosystem C processes with precipitation could be useful for model development, parameterization, and validation at landscape and regional scales to improve predictions of C dynamics in grasslands in response to climate change. Our results indicated that precipitation is an important driver in shaping ecosystem functioning as reflected in vegetation production, litter mass, and soil respiration in grassland ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available