4.0 Article

Achene buoyancy and germinability of the terrestrial invasive Fallopia x bohemica in aquatic environment: A new vector of dispersion?

Journal

ECOSCIENCE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 79-84

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.2980/18-1-3397

Keywords

buoyancy; Fallopia; germination; invasion; seed dispersal; seedling survival; water dispersal

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific basis for the control of Asiatic knotweeds project of FEDER (Plan Loire Grandeur Nature)
  2. Agence de l'Eau Loire Bretagne
  3. Conseil General du departement de la Loire
  4. Region Rhone-Alpes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seed dispersal along watercourses can favour the long-distance migration of invasive species, not only for aquatic or wetland species, but also for terrestrial wind-dispersed plants. It is crucial to investigate the role of watercourses in the dispersal of the knotweed hybrid complex (Fallopia x bohemica) due to its frequent occurrence on riverbanks and production of fertile achenes. For this purpose, we experimentally studied buoyancy and germinability of F. x bohemica achenes in stirred water, over 28 d. We also measured the long-term survival and growth of seedlings according to exposure time to water. After nearly 2 d in the water, 50% of achenes were still afloat. After 3 d, germination occurred in water and the seedlings also floated. Moreover, the exposure of achenes to water, for however long, significantly favoured their germination rate, without affecting seedling survival, compared to a direct planting in soil. Furthermore, a maximum seedling dry mass was reached following exposure to water for 277 h (11.5 d), surpassing significantly the dry mass of seedlings planted directly in soil. Water exposure strongly favours achene germination and seedling survival. Our results demonstrate a high potential for the seeds and seedlings of Fallopia to be dispersed successfully by water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available