4.0 Article

Short term response of small mammals and forest birds to silvicultural practices differing in tree retention in irregular boreal forests

Journal

ECOSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 334-342

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.2980/17-3-3340

Keywords

boreal forest; forest bird community; irregular structure stands; non-parametric multivariate analysis; selection cutting; small mammal community

Categories

Funding

  1. NSERC-Universite Laval industrial research chair in silviculture and wildlife
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Fonds quebecois de recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of logging on wildlife have been evaluated mainly in landscapes dominated by even-aged forest stands, leaving the impacts of harvesting on wildlife in irregularly structured stands less documented. We assessed the response of small mammals and birds to 4 silvicultural treatments with different levels of tree retention (from < 10% to 73%) in old-growth boreal forests of eastern Canada, where approximately 70% of stands have irregular structure. The experimental design controlled for local variation in the abundance of forest birds and small mammals by pairing each experimental harvested stand with an uncut stand. We found that species richness of small mammals and birds did not vary according to tree retention. Moss cover and vertical cover influenced small mammal community composition, whereas forest bird assemblages responded to conifer basal area, vertical cover, and snag availability. Species associated with silvicultural practices entailing retention levels > 55% included those that prefer closed canopy, such as the brown creeper (Certhia americana), ruby-crowned kinglet (Regulus calendula), and red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi). Our study demonstrates that silvicultural practices with retention levels > 55% are the most suitable for mitigating the impact of logging on animal communities in old-growth irregularly structured stands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available