4.6 Article

Effect of Surface Stoichiometry on Blinking and Hole Trapping Dynamics in CdSe Nanocrystals

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 119, Issue 49, Pages 27797-27803

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08243

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Re-Defining Photovoltaic Efficiency Through Molecular-Scale Control, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001085]
  2. Empire State Development's Division of Science, Technology, and Innovation (NYSTAR)
  3. National Science Foundation [DGE07-07425]
  4. Department of Energy [DE-SC0006410]
  5. Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006410] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the photoinduced carrier dynamics as the surface composition of CdSe nanocrystals is systematically varied from metal rich (similar to 80% surface Cd) to nearly stoichiometric (similar to 50% surface Cd). Using time-resolved optical spectroscopy, we determine that the luminescence lifetime is controlled by the rate of hole trapping at the newly exposed surface selenium atoms. However, the increased rate of the photoluminescence decay is not sufficient to explain the decreased photoluminescence quantum yield, and requires a growing proportion of nanocrystals in a dark or OFF state to explain the data. A global kinetic model is proposed that relates the fraction of selenium sites to the rate of hole trapping. A linear relationship between the rate of hole trapping and the fraction of exposed Se sites (x(Se)) is observed within the range of accessible stoichiometries (x(Se) = 0.5.-0.2). Extrapolation to higher surface cadmium fractions suggests that not all Se sites serve as effective hole traps. These results explain the strong nonlinear dependence of the fluorescence yield on the nanocrystal stoichiometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available