4.6 Article

CdSeTe/CdS Type-I Core/Shell Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells with Efficiency over 9%

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 119, Issue 52, Pages 28800-28808

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10546

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21421004, 91433106, 21301059]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering [SKL-ChE-14C04]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China
  4. MEXT KAKENHI [26286013]
  5. CREST program, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26286013] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface trap defects are the limited factor for quantum dots (QDs) application in solar cells. The trapping states can be efficiently suppressed by coating a shell of wider band gap material around the core QDs. We choose CdSe0.65Te0.35 (simplified as CdSeTe) as a model core material, and CdS shell was then overcoated around the CdSeTe core QD to decrease surface defect density and to increase the stability of the core QDs. By optimizing the thickness of the CdS shell, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the CdSeTe/CdS quantum dots sensitized solar cells (QDSCs) is enhanced by 13% in comparison with that of plain CdSeTe QDSCs. Transient absorption (TA), incident-photo-to-carrier conversion efficiency (IPCE), open-circuit voltage decay (OVCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements confirmed the suppressed charge recombination process in internal QDs and QD/TiO2/electrolyte interfaces with the overcoating of CdS shell around CdSeTe core QDs. With the further overcoating of a-TiO2 and SiO2 barrier layers around the QD-sensitized photoanode, the PCE of champion CdSeTe QDSCs achieved 9.48% (Jsc = 20.82 mA/cm(2), V-oc = 0.713 V, FF = 0.639) with average PCE 9.39 + 0.09% under AM 1.5 G one full sun illumination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available