4.3 Article

Large-scale, seasonal habitat use and movements of yellow American eels in the St. Lawrence River revealed by acoustic telemetry

Journal

ECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER FISH
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 99-111

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eff.12129

Keywords

Anguilla; juveniles; behaviour; ecology; telemetry

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-scale habitat use and movements of yellow American eels (Anguilla rostrata) from the St. Lawrence River were examined using acoustic telemetry from early summer to late fall in 2010 and 2011. Sixty-seven eels were tagged, and their passage or presence was recorded using fixed acoustic arrays covering a 400km distance along the St. Lawrence River and Estuary. Sixty-four per cent of the 67 tagged eels were detected. Most eels were detected at only one array; the closest to their release location and at several occasions during the tracking period, suggesting a high proportion of freshwater residency in the upstream part of the St. Lawrence River. Downstream movements towards the brackish estuary (63-418km distance) were demonstrated for 16.4% of the eels, particularly for those caught at the most downstream site that is close to the brackish estuary. Our results strongly suggest a lower activity of freshwater resident yellow eels during summer, a behaviour that may be related to day length, which defines time available for their nocturnal foraging. Indeed, yellow eels were detected primarily at night; no effect of moon phase was revealed. Movements in the vicinity of arrays (up to 116km in the fluvial estuary) were suggested and smaller-scale movements within Lac St. Louis were demonstrated, highlighting a yellow-eel home range far more extensive than previously reported in smaller systems. Evidence for within-season homing and site fidelity is also reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available