4.8 Article

Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 454-463

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12245

Keywords

seasonality; modularity; phylogeny; traits; evolutionary history; current and past climate; ecological networks; Avian seed dispersal; macroecology; weighted bipartite networks

Categories

Funding

  1. Hesse's Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and the Arts
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  4. European Research Council [ERC-2012-StG-310886-HISTFUNC]
  5. Carlsberg Foundation
  6. Danish National Research Foundation of the Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate
  7. Helmholtz Association [VH-NG 247]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modularity is a recurrent and important property of bipartite ecological networks. Although well-resolved ecological networks describe interaction frequencies between species pairs, modularity of bipartite networks has been analysed only on the basis of binary presence-absence data. We employ a new algorithm to detect modularity in weighted bipartite networks in a global analysis of avian seed-dispersal networks. We define roles of species, such as connector values, for weighted and binary networks and associate them with avian species traits and phylogeny. The weighted, but not binary, analysis identified a positive relationship between climatic seasonality and modularity, whereas past climate stability and phylogenetic signal were only weakly related to modularity. Connector values were associated with foraging behaviour and were phylogenetically conserved. The weighted modularity analysis demonstrates the dominating impact of ecological factors on the structure of seed-dispersal networks, but also underscores the relevance of evolutionary history in shaping species roles in ecological communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available