4.8 Article

Ecological interactions drive evolutionary loss of traits

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 1071-1082

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01830.x

Keywords

Comparative genomics; compensated trait loss; dietary composition; gene loss; mutualism; parasitism; symbiosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) through (ALW) [816.01.013]
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) through ETK (VIDI) [864.10.005]
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB-0747002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loss of traits can dramatically alter the fate of species. Evidence is rapidly accumulating that the prevalence of trait loss is grossly underestimated. New findings demonstrate that traits can be lost without affecting the external phenotype, provided the lost function is compensated for by species interactions. This is important because trait loss can tighten the ecological relationship between partners, affecting the maintenance of species interactions. Here, we develop a new perspective on so-called `compensated trait loss' and how this type of trait loss may affect the evolutionary dynamics between interacting organisms. We argue that: (1) the frequency of compensated trait loss is currently underestimated because it can go unnoticed as long as ecological interactions are maintained; (2) by analysing known cases of trait loss, specific factors promoting compensated trait loss can be identified and (3) genomic sequencing is a key way forwards in detecting compensated trait loss. We present a comprehensive literature survey showing that compensated trait loss is taxonomically widespread, can involve essential traits, and often occurs as replicated evolutionary events. Despite its hidden nature, compensated trait loss is important in directing evolutionary dynamics of ecological relationships and has the potential to change facultative ecological interactions into obligatory ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available