4.8 Article

A hierarchical theory of macroecology

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 923-934

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01809.x

Keywords

Abundance-distribution relationship; biodiversity; body size; diatoms; energetic equivalence; fish; invertebrates; niche breadth; resource limitation; scaling

Categories

Funding

  1. Norman Hackerman Advanced Research Program [003656-0054-2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationships of local population density (N) with body size (M) and distribution (D) have been extensively studied because they reveal how ecological and historical factors structure species communities; however, a unifying model explaining their joint behaviour, has not been developed. Here, I propose a theory that explores these relationships hierarchically and predicts that: (1) at a metacommunity level, niche breadth, population density and regional distribution are all related and size-dependent and (2) at a community level, the exponents b and d of the relationships N similar to similar to similar to M similar to b and N similar to similar to similar to D similar to d are functions (f) of the environment and, consequently, species richness (S), allowing the following reformulation of the power laws: N similar to similar to similar to M similar to f(S) and N similar to similar to similar to D f(S) . Using this framework and continental data on stream environment, diatoms, invertebrates and fish, I address the following fundamental, but unresolved ecological questions: how do species partition their resources across environments, is energetic equivalence among them possible, are generalists more common than specialists, why are locally abundant species also regionally prevalent, and, do microbes have different biogeography than macroorganisms? The discovery that community scaling behaviour is environmentally constrained calls for better integration of macroecology and environmental science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available