4.8 Article

The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 393-405

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x

Keywords

Biogeography; biomes; climate; plant hydraulics; plant traits

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-0546784]
  2. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing drought is one of the most critical challenges facing species and ecosystems worldwide, and improved theory and practices are needed for quantification of species tolerances. Leaf water potential at turgor loss, or wilting (ptlp), is classically recognised as a major physiological determinant of plant water stress response. However, the cellular basis of ptlp and its importance for predicting ecological drought tolerance have been controversial. A meta-analysis of 317 species from 72 studies showed that ptlp was strongly correlated with water availability within and across biomes, indicating power for anticipating drought responses. We derived new equations giving both ptlp and relative water content at turgor loss point (RWCtlp) as explicit functions of osmotic potential at full turgor (po) and bulk modulus of elasticity (e). Sensitivity analyses and meta-analyses showed that po is the major driver of ptlp. In contrast, e plays no direct role in driving drought tolerance within or across species, but sclerophylly and elastic adjustments act to maintain RWCtlp, preventing cell dehydration, and additionally protect against nutrient, mechanical and herbivory stresses independent of drought tolerance. These findings clarify biogeographic trends and the underlying basis of drought tolerance parameters with applications in comparative assessments of species and ecosystems worldwide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available