4.8 Article

Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 788-796

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01641.x

Keywords

Biogeochemistry; biogeography of plant chemistry; climate; plant nutrients; plant functional type; soil nutrient availability; soil pH; stability of limiting elements; stoichiometry; variability in leaf mineral elements

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40973054, 31021001, 30821003]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China on Global Change [2010CB50600]
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [DEB-0080382]
  4. University of Minnesota Institute on the Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding variation of plant nutrients is largely limited to nitrogen and to a lesser extent phosphorus. Here we analyse patterns of variation in 11 elements (nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium/calcium/magnesium/sulphur/silicon/iron/sodium/manganese/aluminium) in leaves of 1900 plant species across China. The concentrations of these elements show significant latitudinal and longitudinal trends, driven by significant influences of climate, soil and plant functional type. Precipitation explains more variation than temperature for all elements except phosphorus and aluminium, and the 11 elements differentiate in relation to climate, soil and functional type. Variability (assessed as the coefficient of variation) and environmental sensitivity (slope of responses to environmental gradients) are lowest for elements that are required in the highest concentrations, most abundant and most often limiting in nature (the Stability of Limiting Elements Hypothesis). Our findings can help initiate a more holistic approach to ecological plant nutrition and lay the groundwork for the eventual development of multiple element biogeochemical models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available