4.8 Review

The ecological causes of individual specialisation

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 948-958

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x

Keywords

Competition; ecological opportunity; ecology of individuals; food webs; niche variation hypothesis; optimal foraging theory; predator-prey interactions; stable isotopes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. U. S. Department of Homeland Security
  3. U. S. Department of Agriculture through NSF [EF-0832858]
  4. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  5. NSF [OCE 0746164, DEB 0842196]
  6. CAPES
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  8. David and Lucille Packard Foundation
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [842196] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many generalist populations are composed of specialised individuals, whose niches are small subsets of the population niche. This 'individual specialisation' is a widespread phenomenon in natural populations, but until recently few studies quantified the magnitude of individual specialisation and how this magnitude varies among populations or contexts. Such quantitative approaches are necessary for us to understand how ecological interactions influence the amount of among-individual variation, and how the amount of variation might affect ecological dynamics. Herein, we review recent studies of individual specialisation, emphasising the novel insights arising from quantitative measures of diet variation. Experimental and comparative studies have confirmed long-standing theoretical expectations that the magnitude of among-individual diet variation depends on the level of intra and interspecific competition, ecological opportunity and predation. In contrast, there is little empirical information as to how individual specialisation affects community dynamics. We discuss some emerging methodological issues as guidelines for researchers studying individual specialisation, and make specific recommendations regarding avenues for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available