4.8 Article

Forest species diversity reduces disease risk in a generalist plant pathogen invasion

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 1108-1116

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01679.x

Keywords

Bayesian hierarchical model; emerging infectious disease; forest ecosystem; landscape epidemiology; Phytophthora ramorum; spatial autocorrelation; species diversity; sudden oak death; zero-inflation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-EF-0622677, EF-0622770]
  2. NSF-NIH Ecology of Infectious Disease
  3. USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station
  4. USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection
  5. State and Private Forestry
  6. Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1115720] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Empirical evidence suggests that biodiversity loss can increase disease transmission, yet our understanding of the 'diversity-disease hypothesis' for generalist pathogens in natural ecosystems is limited. We used a landscape epidemiological approach to examine two scenarios regarding diversity effects on the emerging plant pathogen Phytophthora ramorum across a broad, heterogeneous ecoregion: (1) an amplification effect exists where disease risk is greater in areas with higher plant diversity due to the pathogen's wide host range, or (2) a dilution effect where risk is reduced with increasing diversity due to lower competency of alternative hosts. We found evidence for pathogen dilution, whereby disease risk was lower in sites with higher species diversity, after accounting for potentially confounding effects of host density and landscape heterogeneity. Our results suggest that although nearly all plants in the ecosystem are hosts, alternative hosts may dilute disease transmission by competent hosts, thereby buffering forest health from infectious disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available