4.8 Article

Sexually transmitted bacteria affect female cloacal assemblages in a wild bird

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1515-1524

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01542.x

Keywords

ARISA; black-legged kittiwake; cloacal bacteria; gastrointestinal microbiota; mating behaviour; sexual selection; sexually transmitted diseases; transmission

Categories

Funding

  1. French Polar Institute Paul-Emile Victor [429, 1162]
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique [2410]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-05, NT05-3_42075]
  4. Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) [P20401]
  5. Fondation Fyssen post-doctoral study grant
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P20401] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 20401] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sexual transmission is an important mode of disease propagation, yet its mechanisms remain largely unknown in wild populations. Birds comprise an important model for studying sexually transmitted microbes because their cloaca provides a potential for both gastrointestinal pathogens and endosymbionts to become incorporated into ejaculates. We experimentally demonstrate in a wild population of kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) that bacteria are transmitted during copulation and affect the composition and diversity of female bacterial communities. We used an anti-insemination device attached to males in combination with a molecular technique (automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis) that describes bacterial communities. After inseminations were experimentally blocked, the cloacal communities of mates became increasingly dissimilar. Moreover, female cloacal diversity decreased and the extinction of mate-shared bacteria increased, indicating that female cloacal assemblages revert to their pre-copulatory state and that the cloaca comprises a resilient microbial ecosystem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available