4.5 Article

Communicating adaptation with emotions: the role of intense experiences in raising concern about extreme weather

Journal

ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
DOI: 10.5751/ES-06474-190236

Keywords

adaptation; availability heuristic; extreme weather; risk communication; risk perception

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Knowledge for Climate (KvK) [830.10.005]
  3. VENI grant from NWO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adaptation to extreme weather is often considered as having a low urgency and being a low priority governance option, even though the intensity of extreme weather events is expected to increase as a result of climate change. An important issue is how to raise an adequate level of concern among individuals, policy makers, and broader decision makers in companies and organizations so that adaptation to extreme events becomes mainstream practice. We conducted 40 indepth interviews with individuals from different sectors in The Netherlands to identify the different types of experiences with extreme events, as well as the relationship between such experiences and the level of concern about extreme weather. Our results indicate that individuals who have experienced an intense, life-threatening event have a significantly higher level of concern than those without such an experience. Professional experience and secondhand experience through participating in information events do not significantly affect the level of concern about extreme events. This suggests limited intervention possibilities for communication of adaptation, as well as for raising support for adaptation measures. Framing adaptation measures in relation to personal circumstances and emotions during extreme events could help raise concern about extreme weather events, as well as societal support for adaptation measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available