4.5 Article

Governance of Aquatic Agricultural Systems: Analyzing Representation, Power, and Accountability

Journal

ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
DOI: 10.5751/ES-06043-180459

Keywords

accountability; Bangladesh; Cambodia; civil society; coastal zone management; environmental governance; livelihoods; Malawi; Mozambique; power; social-ecological resilience; Solomon Islands; stakeholder representation; wetlands

Funding

  1. CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems
  2. CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets
  3. Wetlands Alliance Program
  4. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
  5. Community-Based Fish Culture in Irrigation Systems and Seasonal Floodplains project
  6. CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
  7. Lake Chilwa Basin Climate Change Adaptation Program
  8. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  9. Coral Reef Initiatives for the Pacific
  10. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aquatic agricultural systems in developing countries face increasing competition from multiple stakeholders over rights to access and use natural resources, land, water, wetlands, and fisheries, essential to rural livelihoods. A key implication is the need to strengthen governance to enable equitable decision making amidst competition that spans sectors and scales, building capacities for resilience, and for transformations in institutions that perpetuate poverty. In this paper we provide a simple framework to analyze the governance context for aquatic agricultural system development focused on three dimensions: stakeholder representation, distribution of power, and mechanisms of accountability. Case studies from Cambodia, Bangladesh, Malawi/Mozambique, and Solomon Islands illustrate the application of these concepts to fisheries and aquaculture livelihoods in the broader context of intersectoral and cross-scale governance interactions. Comparing these cases, we demonstrate how assessing governance dimensions yields practical insights into opportunities for transforming the institutions that constrain resilience in local livelihoods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available