4.6 Article

Origin of the Different Photoelectrochemical Performance of Mesoporous BiVO4 Photoanodes between the BiVO4 and the FTO Side Illumination

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 119, Issue 41, Pages 23350-23357

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07505

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC/Hong Kong RGC Joint Research Scheme [N_HKUST610/14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding charge separation and charge transport in mesoporous semiconductor films is crucial to designing high efficiency photoelectrochemical water splitting cells. In the present work, we systematically study the origin of the higher photoelectrochemical performance of mesoporous BiVO4 film under FTO-side illumination (F-illumination) than that under BiVO4-side illumination (B-illumination). Via intensity-modulated photocurrent spectroscopy in conjunction with modeling simulation of electron diffusion inside mesoporous BiVO4 films with different thicknesses, we find that the F-illumination is more tolerant to recombination than the B-illumination, leading to a higher charge separation efficiency of the former. Specifically, we have identified a trap-free electron transport region of BiVO4 vicinal to the FTO substrate and a trap-limited transport region farther away under F-illumination, whereas only a trap-limited transport exists under B-illumination. Simulated results accord well with the experimental data and further provide a deep insight of the detailed electron transport behavior: it is the higher electron density in the region proximal to the FTO under F-illumination that has led to the greater recombination tolerance than under B-illumination. Such a photogenerated electron transport characteristic in mesoporous films is expected to be common for other semiconductors and will inspire practide strategies for designing high efficiency semiconductor nanostructure-based photoelectrochemical devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available