4.7 Article

Do fungivores trigger the transfer of protective metabolites from host plants to arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae?

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 9, Pages 2019-2029

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/12-1943.1

Keywords

cooperation; defense; Folsomia candida; Glomus sp; mutualism; networks; Plantago lanceolata; species interactions; symbiosis

Categories

Funding

  1. ANR-ECS
  2. Czech Science Foundation [P504121665]
  3. National Science Foundation [1051397]
  4. Dutch Science Foundation [NWO: meervoud 836.10.001, vidi 864.10.005]
  5. NWO [822.01.003]
  6. [RVO 61388971]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1051397] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A key objective in ecology is to understand how cooperative strategies evolve and are maintained in species networks. Here, we focus on the tri-trophic relationship between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, host plants, and fungivores to ask if host plants are able to protect their mutualistic mycorrhizal partners from being grazed. Specifically, we test whether secondary metabolites are transferred from hosts to fungal partners to increase their defense against fungivores. We grew Plantago lanceolata hosts with and without mycorrhizal inoculum, and in the presence or absence of fungivorous springtails. We then measured fungivore effects on host biomass and mycorrhizal abundance (using quantitative PCR) in roots and soil. We used high-performance liquid chromatography to measure host metabolites in roots, shoots, and hyphae, focusing on catalpol, aucubin, and verbascoside. Our most striking result was that the metabolite catalpol was consistently found in AM fungal hyphae in host plants exposed to fungivores. When fungivores were absent, catalpol was undetectable in hyphae. Our results highlight the potential for plant-mediated protection of the mycorrhizal hyphal network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available