4.7 Article

Large effects of consumer offense on ecosystem structure and function

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 2375-2380

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/13-0320.1

Keywords

arms race; Daphnia; eco-evolutionary dynamics; harmful algal blooms (HABs); local adaptation; Microcystis; nutrient enrichment; primary productivity; toxic cyanobacteria; trophic cascades

Categories

Funding

  1. EPA STAR
  2. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. NSF [DEB-0841864, DEB-0841944, DBI-0965272]
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0841864, 0841944] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0965272] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study of the role of within-species adaptation in ecological dynamics has focused largely on prey adaptations that reduce consumption risk (prey defense). Few, if any, studies have examined how consumer adaptations to overcome prey defenses (consumer offense) affect ecosystem structure and function. We manipulated two sets of genotypes of a planktonic herbivore (Daphnia pulicaria) in a highly productive ecosystem with abundant toxic prey (cyanobacteria). The two sets of consumer genotypes varied widely in their tolerance of toxic cyanobacteria in the diet (i.e., sensitive vs. tolerant). We found a large effect of tolerant D. pulicaria on phytoplankton biomass and gross primary productivity but no effect of sensitive genotypes, this result stemming from genotype-specific differences in population growth in the presence of toxic prey. The former effect was as large as effects seen in previous Daphnia manipulations at similar productivity levels. Thus, we demonstrated that the effect of consumer genotypes with contrasting offensive adaptations was as large as the effect of consumer presence/absence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available