4.7 Article

Competitive exclusion within the predator community influences the distribution of a threatened prey species

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages 1802-1808

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/12-0285.1

Keywords

Accipiter gentilis; competitive exclusion; Siberian flying squirrel; habitat selection; landscape composition; Northern Goshawk; predator community; Pteromys volans; spatial distribution; species interactions; Strix uralensis; Ural Owl

Categories

Funding

  1. Maj and Tor Nessling foundation [2009126, 2010027, 2011057]
  2. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  3. Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica
  4. Svensk-Osterbottniska samfundet
  5. Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While much effort has been made to quantify how landscape composition influences the distribution of species, the possibility that geographical differences in species interactions might affect species distributions has received less attention. Investigating a predator-prey setting in a boreal forest ecosystem, we empirically show that large-scale differences in the predator community structure and small-scale competitive exclusion among predators affect the local distribution of a threatened forest specialist more than does landscape composition. Consequently, even though the landscape parameters affecting Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) distribution (prey) did not differ between nest sites of the predators Northern Goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) and Ural Owls (Strix uralensis), flying squirrels were heterospecifically attracted by goshawks in a region where both predator species were present. No such effect was found in another region where Ural Owls were absent. These results provide evidence that differences in species interactions over large spatial scales may be a major force influencing the distribution and abundance patterns of species. On the basis of these findings, we suspect that subtle species interactions might be a central reason why landscape models constructed to predict species distributions often fail when applied to wider geographical scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available