4.7 Article

Climate, icing, and wild arctic reindeer: past relationships and future prospects

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 10, Pages 1917-1923

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/11-0095.1

Keywords

caribou; climate change; forage accessibility; herbivore; ice; population dynamics; ROS; rain-on-snow; Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus; Svalbard reindeer; ungulate; vegetation

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. Norwegian Polar Institute
  3. Centre for Conservation Biology
  4. Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Across the Arctic, heavy rain-on-snow (ROS) is an extreme climatic event that is expected to become increasingly frequent with global warming. This has potentially large ecosystem implications through changes in snowpack properties and ground-icing, which can block the access to herbivores' winter food and thereby suppress their population growth rates. However, the supporting empirical evidence for this is still limited. We monitored late winter snowpack properties to examine the causes and consequences of ground-icing in a Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) metapopulation. In this high-arctic area, heavy ROS occurred annually, and ground-ice covered from 25% to 96% of low-altitude habitat in the sampling period (2000-2010). The extent of ground-icing increased with the annual number, of days with heavy ROS (>= 10 mm) and had a strong negative effect on reindeer population growth rates. Our results have important implications as a downscaled climate projection (2021-2050) suggests a substantial future increase in ROS and icing. The present study is the first to demonstrate empirically that warmer and wetter winter climate influences large herbivore population dynamics by generating ice-locked pastures. This may serve as an early warning of the importance of changes in winter climate and extreme weather events in arctic ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available