4.7 Article

Nonadditive effects of floral display and spur length on reproductive success in a deceptive orchid

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages 2167-2174

Publisher

ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1890/11-0791.1

Keywords

adaptive significance; correlational selection; Dactylorhiza lapponica; floral evolution; mechanism of selection; phenotypic manipulation experiment; pollination by deceit; pollination efficiency; pollinator attraction; pollinator-mediated selection

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters
  3. Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pollinators may mediate selection on traits affecting pollinator attraction and effectiveness, and while nonadditive effects of traits influencing the two components of pollination success are expected when seed production is pollen limited, they have been little studied. In a factorial design, we manipulated one putative attraction trait (number of flowers) and one putative efficiency trait (spur length) previously shown to be subject to pollinator-mediated selection in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica. Removal of half of the flowers reduced pollen removal, proportion of flowers receiving pollen, fruit set, and fruit mass compared to unmanipulated plants, while spur-tip removal increased fruit set and fruit mass but did not affect pollen removal or proportion of flowers receiving pollen. The effect of spur-tip removal on fruit mass was stronger among plants with intact number of flowers compared to plants with experimentally reduced number of flowers. The results demonstrate that number of flowers and spur length are direct targets of selection and may affect female fitness nonadditively. More generally, they show that the adaptive value of a given trait can depend on floral context and illustrate how experimental approaches can advance our understanding of the evolution of trait combinations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available