4.7 Article

Modeling spatial variation in avian survival and residency probabilities

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages 1885-1891

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/09-0705.1

Keywords

capture-recapture; CAR model; Cormack-Jolly-Seber; Hylocichla mustelina; MAPS program; mist netting; residency; spatial autoregressive model; spatial ecology; survival estimation; transient model; Wood Thrush

Categories

Funding

  1. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
  2. U.S. Geological Survey. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of understanding spatial variation in processes driving animal population dynamics is widely recognized. Yet little attention has been paid to spatial modeling of vital rates. Here we describe a hierarchical spatial autoregressive model to provide spatially explicit year-specific estimates of apparent survival (phi) and residency (pi) probabilities from capture-recapture data. We apply the model to data collected on a declining bird species, Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), as part of a broad-scale bird-banding network, the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) program. The Wood Thrush analysis showed variability in both phi and pi among years and across space. Spatial heterogeneity in residency probability was particularly striking, suggesting the importance of understanding the role of transients in local populations. We found broad-scale spatial patterning in Wood Thrush phi and pi that lend insight into population trends and can direct conservation and research. The spatial model developed here represents a significant advance over approaches to investigating spatial pattern in vital rates that aggregate data at coarse spatial scales and do not explicitly incorporate spatial information in the model. Further development and application of hierarchical capture-recapture models offers the opportunity to more fully investigate spatiotemporal variation in the processes that drive population changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available