4.7 Article

Community genetic interactions mediate indirect ecological effects between a parasitoid wasp and rhizobacteria

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages 1563-1568

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/09-2070.1

Keywords

community genetics; genetic interactions; genetic variation; indirect ecological effect (IEE); parasitoid wasp; rhizobacteria; species interactions

Categories

Funding

  1. NERC
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/T/S/2002/00188] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Indirect ecological effects (IEEs) clearly influence species dynamics and abundance, yet relatively little is known about how they influence the evolution of species involved. While genetic variation in the species causing and responding to the IEE has obvious effects, the influence of genetic variation in intermediate species remains unexamined. Given the often counterintuitive responses of populations to IEEs this seems a significant omission. Following a community genetics approach, we used a model tetra-trophic system (parasitoid wasp, aphid, barley, and rhizobacteria) to investigate the effect of genetic interactions within the two linking species (aphids and barley) on the IEE of rhizobacteria on wasps. We show that 12.4% of the variation in wasp size, a proxy for fitness, is explained by higher-order interactions between aphid genotype (A), barley genotype (B), and presence or absence of rhizobacteria (R) (Genotype([B]) x Genotype([A]) x Environment([R])). Thus, the IEE of rhizobacteria on the parasitoid wasp is influenced by the specific combination of aphid and barley genotypes that mediate the interactions. In some cases changes in the genotypes of the intermediate species completely reverse the effect of rhizobacteria on wasp size. Our work demonstrates that within-species genetic variation is important in shaping IEEs in communities, an essential component of community evolutionary processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available