4.7 Article

Photosynthetic overcompensation under nocturnal warming enhances grassland carbon sequestration

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages 2700-2710

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/08-2026.1

Keywords

carbohydrate; carbon; China; climate warming; ecosystem; photosynthesis; respiration; temperate steppe; temperature

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90511006, 30590382, 30821062]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007CB106803]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (Hundred Talents Program)
  4. State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mechanistic understanding of the carbon (C) cycle-climate change feedback is essential for projecting future states of climate and ecosystems. Here we report a novel field mechanism and evidence supporting the hypothesis that nocturnal warming in a temperate steppe ecosystem in northern China can result in a minor C sink instead of a C source as models have predicted. Nocturnal warming increased leaf respiration of two dominant grass species by 36.3%, enhanced consumption of carbohydrates in the leaves (72.2% and 60.5% for sugar and starch, respectively), and consequently stimulated plant photosynthesis by 19.8% in the subsequent days. Our experimental findings confirm previous observations of nocturnal warming stimulating plant photosynthesis through increased draw-down of leaf carbohydrates at night. The enhancement of plant photosynthesis overcompensated the increased C loss via plant respiration under nocturnal warming and shifted the steppe ecosystem from a minor C source (1.87 g C.m(-2).yr(-1)) to a C sink (21.72 g C.m(-2).yr(-1)) across the three growing seasons from 2006 to 2008. Given greater increases in daily minimum than maximum temperature in many regions, plant photosynthetic overcompensation may partially serve as a negative feedback mechanism for terrestrial biosphere to climate warming.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available