4.7 Article

Experimental dry-season N deposition alters species composition in southern Californian mediterranean-type shrublands

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 8, Pages 2183-2189

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/08-1121.1

Keywords

Adenostoma fasciculatum; air pollution; Artemisia californica; Ceanothus greggii; disturbance; diversity; N-deposition treatments; plant community composition; Salvia mellifera; secondary succession; semiarid shrublands; southern California chaparral and coastal sage scrub

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF-CAREER [DEB-0133259]
  2. NIH-NIGMS-SCORE [S06 GM 59833]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen (N) deposition in heavily polluted southern Californian shrublands is estimated to be 20-45 kg N.ha(-1).yr(-1), but more exposed locales can receive as much as 145 kg N.ha(-1).yr(-1). This large anthropogenic N input has the capacity to alter the composition of plant communities. We conducted N-fertilization experiments in chaparral and coastal sage scrub (CSS) stands over a five-year period to test the hypothesis that plant community composition would change in response to dry-season N addition because of an increase in the relative abundance of herbaceous plant species. Our results indicate that dry-season addition of N significantly altered the community composition of CSS but not chaparral. Contrary to our original hypothesis, changes in community composition were due to changes in the relative abundance of dominant shrubs and not herbaceous plant species. Given that community-level responses to changes in resource availability may take years to decades in order to fully materialize, our results suggest that continued dry-season input of N will cause even larger changes in community composition over time. These results have implications for plant species composition and diversity of mediterranean-type shrublands as N deposition increases with population growth and fossil-fuel use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available