4.6 Article

Cocatalyst Effects on Hydrogen Evolution in a Plasmon-Induced Water-Splitting System

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 119, Issue 16, Pages 8889-8897

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01720

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [23225006]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [25107501]
  3. Nanotechnology Platform (Hokkaido University)
  4. Low-Carbon Research Network of Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H00856, 25107501, 23225006] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explored the performance of hydrogen (H-2) evolution using noble metals or their metal oxides as cocatalysts in the plasmon-induced water-splitting system. Although many studies have employed n-type semiconductor particle systems to investigate cocatalyst effects, evaluating only the catalytic activity of H-2 and oxygen (O-2) evolution has been limited by (1) the difficulty of transferring an electron injected into the conduction band of a semiconductor to a cocatalyst due to the formation of a Schottky barrier when a metallic cocatalyst for H2 evolution contacts the n-type semiconductor and (2) the potential for a reverse water-splitting reaction, which occurs due to the promotion of the reduction of the evolved O-2 by the cocatalyst. To overcome these limitations, in the present study, we eliminated the adverse effect of the Schottky barrier by obtaining ohmic contact between the semiconductor and the metal or metal oxide cocatalysts, and we used two separate reaction chambers for H-2 and O-2 evolution to avoid reverse water-splitting reactions such as H2O2 recombination or the photoreduction of O-2. A 23 nm thick rhodium layer deposited on a platinum board exhibited relatively high performance, a 3-fold increase compared with the absence of a metal or metal oxide cocatalyst thin layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available