4.3 Article

Effect of competition on habitat utilization in two temperate climate gecko species

Journal

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 551-560

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-011-0921-5

Keywords

Interspecies interaction; Lizard ecology; Niche shift; Spatial niche; Species assemblage

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia [119-0000000-1285]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Competition over spatial niche utilisation is one of most common competitive interactions between species in sympatry. Moreover, competitive interactions may involve age classes, and can fluctuate temporally. Consequently, evasive strategies that enable co-existence are likely to be important in the evolution of species assemblages. Here we investigate a system of two co-existing species of temperate geckos with similar ecologies (the house gecko, and the wall gecko, ), providing an opportunity to study the effect of species interactions. Juveniles and adults of both species were investigated throughout their daily and annual cycle to explore the effect of inter- and intra-specific interactions on microhabitat use. The two species showed differences in habitat use for both age classes in sympatry. In sympatry, uses more open habitats and is more active. In contrast, is found in more closed habitats, closer to the ground and to vegetation cover. In allopatry, was observed in more open habitats, closer to the ground, and to vegetation cover, when compared to the population in sympatry with . These differences in habitat usage were significant for both age classes. Moreover, there were differences, both in sympatry and in allopatry, between age classes that were dependent on season. In conclusion, the presence of a competitor induces a spatial shift in individuals of both age classes of . Observed plasticity in habitat utilisation in both age classes of is used to argue for the invasive potential of this species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available