4.3 Article

A phylogenetic analysis of sex-specific evolution of ecological morphology in Liolaemus lizards

Journal

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1223-1231

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-009-0607-4

Keywords

Natural selection; Adaptive radiation; Adaptation; Convergence; Ecomorphology; Sexual dimorphism; Lizards; Liolaemus

Categories

Funding

  1. Universities UK through an Overseas Research Student Award
  2. University of Exeter for Scholarships, Phrynosaura Chile and Oxford University Press
  3. Royal Society Research Fellowship
  4. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adaptive radiation theory predicts that phenotypic traits involved in ecological performance evolve in different directions in populations subjected to divergent natural selection, resulting in the evolution of ecological diversity. This idea has largely been supported through comparative studies exploring relationships between ecological preferences and quantitative traits among different species. However, intersexual perspectives are often ignored. Indeed, although it is well established that intersexual competition and sex-specific parental and reproductive roles may often subject sex-linked phenotypes to antagonistic selection effects, most ecomorphological research has explored adaptive evolution on a single sex, or on means obtained from both sexes together. The few studies taking sexual differences into account reveal the occurrence of sex-specific ecomorphs in some clades of lizards, and conclude that the independent contribution of the sexes to the morphological diversity produced by adaptive radiation can be substantial. Here, we investigate whether microhabitat use results in the evolution of sex-specific ecomorphs across 44 Liolaemus lizard species. We found that microhabitat structure does not predict variation in body size and shape in either of the sexes. Yet, we found that males and females tend to occupy significantly different positions in multivariate morphological spaces, indicating that treating males and females as ecologically and phenotypically equivalent units may lead to incomplete or mistaken estimations of the diversity produced by adaptive evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available