4.3 Article

Trophic ecology of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in the ocean: a synthesis of stable isotope research

Journal

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 855-863

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-008-0559-0

Keywords

Trophic partitioning; Spatial partitioning; Carbon; Nitrogen; Meta-analysis; Stable isotope

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. Alaska salmon processors
  4. University of Washington

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing interest in the marine trophic dynamics of Pacific salmon has been motivated by the recognition of their sensitivity to changing climate and to the competitive effects of hatchery fish on wild stocks. It has become more common to use stable isotopes to supplement traditional diet studies of salmon in the ocean; however, there have been no integrated syntheses of these data to determine whether stable isotope analyses support the existing conventional wisdom of feeding strategies of the Pacific salmon. We performed a meta-analysis of stable isotope data to examine the extent of trophic partitioning among five species of Pacific salmon during their marine lives. Pink, sockeye, and chum salmon showed very high overlap in resource use and there was no consistent evidence for chum relying on alternative food webs dominated by gelatinous zooplankton. delta N-15 showed that Chinook and coho salmon fed at trophic levels higher than the other three species. In addition, these two species were distinctly enriched in C-13, suggesting more extensive use of coastal food webs compared to the more depleted (pelagic) signatures of pink, sockeye, and chum salmon. This paper presents the first synthesis of stable isotope work on Pacific salmon and provides delta N-15 and delta C-13 values applicable to research on the fate of the marine derived nutrients these organisms transport to freshwater and riparian ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available