4.7 Article

Defining past ecological status and in situ reference conditions using benthic foraminifera: A case study from the Oslofjord, Norway

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 219-233

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.031

Keywords

Environmental monitoring; In situ reference conditions; Biological quality element; Conservation Paleobiology; European Water Framework Directive; Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS)

Funding

  1. Fagradet for vann og avlopsteknisk samarbeid i indre Oslofjord, Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus
  2. Climate and Pollution Agency
  3. University of Oslo
  4. Norwegian Research Council project PES [184870]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Characterizing marine water bodies and defining ecological status, both present and past (pre-impacted), has become an important task for EU's Member States and their associates during the last decade due to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). However, none of the methods used to define Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) are able to accurately define the status for both the present-day and reference conditions at a given site (i.e., in situ). Recent studies have revealed a significant correlation between the diversity of living (stained) fossilizable benthic foraminifera (protists) and associated environmental parameters (e.g., dissolved oxygen concentration). The present study takes this relationship a step further by applying methods used to define present-day EcoQS on fossil benthic foraminiferal assemblages and, thereby, defining past EcoQS (PaleoEcoQS). This is particularly useful for defining reference condition in areas where biological- and instrumental time-series are limited or lacking. Our case study from the Oslofjord, Norway, shows that (1) the Foraminiferal method can define temporal developments in in situ EcoQS from reference to present-day conditions, (2) results of the Foraminiferal method reflect available historical biological records and hydrographic time series, (3) data (1993 and 2009) on macrofauna (traditional bin-monitoring tool) and benthic foraminifera from the same sites define the same EcoQS, and (4) the changes in foraminiferal diversity through time are due to human activity (pollution), rather than climate change. Using in situ data to define ecological reference conditions is preferable compared to modeling or comparisons with present-day supposedly similar reference conditions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available