4.7 Article

Diatom ecological guilds as indicators of temporally changing stressors and disturbances in the small Torna-stream, Hungary

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 138-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.003

Keywords

Diatom ecological guilds; Stressors; Disturbances; Seasonality; Torna-stream

Funding

  1. Hungarian National Science Foundation [K 75552, K 81599]
  2. Otto Kinne Foundation
  3. Hungarian Government
  4. European Union
  5. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this research, indicator properties of the three recently described diatom ecological guilds (low profile, high profile and motile) and their responses to different stressors and disturbances were tested along a temporal gradient. Experiments were run at a standard sampling site in the Torna-stream (Hungary) between 2008 and 2010 using standardized substrata. The low profile guild was dominant during periods with low nutrient (SRP and TN) availability. In contrast, the high profile guild was dominant in resource rich (SRP and SRSi) periods. The motile ecological guild was the most sensitive to the nutrients (TN and SRSi) and some other factors (e.g. temperature, Cl-). Increasing irradiance in spring and summer favored the growth of the high and the low profile guild. Higher resistance to floods favored the adhesion type of the low profile guild enabling their summer peak in terms of relative abundance. During high flood periods, incident light availability apparently sufficed the needs of this guild. Seasonal changes of the diatom ecological guilds and guild diversity were robust and predictable. This study supported that the ecological responses of diatom ecological guilds, despite the apparent simplicity of the grouping method, is strong enough to indicate the temporally changing environmental conditions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available