4.6 Article

Charge Recombination Dynamics in Sensitized SnO2/TiO2 Core/Shell Photoanodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 119, Issue 51, Pages 28353-28360

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10574

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UNC Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC): Center for Solar Fuels, an EFRC - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001011]
  2. U.S. Department of Education program for Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN) [P200A100014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies have been conducted to examine the mechanisms of charge recombination in dye-sensitized SnO2/TiO2 core/shell films. Nanostructured SnO2/TiO2 core/shell films varying in TiO2 shell thicknesses were prepared via atomic layer deposition and sensitized with a phosphonate-derivatized ruthenium chromophore [Ru(bpy)(2)(4,4'-(PO3H2)(2)bpy)](2+). Transient absorption spectroscopy was used to study the interfacial charge recombination dynamics for these core/shell materials. Charge recombination for sensitized, as-deposited SnO2/TiO2 core/shell systems is dominated by a tunneling mechanism for shell thicknesses between 0 and 3.2 nm, with beta = 0.25 angstrom(-1). For shell thicknesses greater than 3.2 nm, recombination primarily proceeds directly via electrons localized in the relatively thick TiO2 shell. Annealing the SnO2/TiO2 core/shell structure at 450 degrees C affects the recombination dynamics substantially; charge recombination dynamics for the annealed films do not show a dependence on shell thickness and are comparable to ZrO2/TiO2 control samples, suggesting the annealing process perturbs the core/shell interface. This analysis of charge recombination dynamics indicates that there is an optimum shell thickness to maximize charge separation lifetimes in dye-sensitized core/shell photoanodes and that the nature of the core/shell interface influences the efficacy of these materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available