4.6 Article

Phosphorus storage dynamics and adsorption characteristics for sediment from a drinking water source reservoir and its relation with sediment compositions

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 276-284

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.01.005

Keywords

Phosphorus adsorption; Sediment composition; Fractional analysis; Amorphous iron oxides

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51209011, 51379017]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Research Institute of Soil and Water Conservation Open Research Project [JX5B201206]
  3. 948 Imported Project of Ministry of Water Resource [201208]
  4. Special Funds for Technology Research and Development of Ministry of Science and Technology [2012EG136134]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water and sediment samples were collected from a representative drinking water source reservoir to investigate the nutrient spatial distributions, phosphorus storage, adsorption features and its relation with sediment compositions. Monitored water TN, TP concentrations, sediment pH values exhibited a gradual decrease trend from the upstream to the downstream. Sediment A1T content (total aluminum oxides) was 2-4 times higher than FeT (total iron oxides) which mainly comprised with Fed (free iron oxides) and Feox (amorphous iron oxides). Phosphorus fractional analysis found that Ca-P was the major phosphorus component while Ex-P +Al-P + Fe-P contents accounted for no more than 20% to sediment TP. Phosphorus adsorption process followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm equations better than other kinetic and isotherm models. Film-diffusion was the rate-limiting step and physic processes dominated phosphorus adsorption. Maximal phosphorus adsorption capacities could be significantly well simulated with sediment Feox, FeT and TP concentrations (r(2) =0.96). (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available