4.6 Article

Overall performance evaluation of shallow maturation ponds in series treating UASB reactor effluent: Ten years of intensive monitoring of a system in Brazil

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 206-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.044

Keywords

Domestic sewage; Maturation ponds; UASB reactors; Developing countries

Funding

  1. Brazilian agency CAPES
  2. Brazilian agency CNPq
  3. Brazilian agency FAPEMIG
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation under the coordination of Unesco-IHE, Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maturation (polishing) ponds operating after UASB (upflow anaerobic sludge blanket) reactors are considered a highly suitable system for treating domestic sewage for small to medium communities in warm-climate developing countries. Important attributes are operational simplicity, good organic matter and nitrogen removal, excellent pathogen removal and lower land requirements compared to traditional pond systems. However, most papers in the literature focus on single studies investigating one particular aspect of this system. The objective of the current paper is to present a broad evaluation of one particular system (UASB reactor, three shallow ponds and a coarse rock filter in series) in Brazil treating sewage from 250 inhabitants over a period of 10 years. The study covers in an integrated manner the removal and behaviour of several variables, such as organic matter (BOD and COD), solids, nitrogen fractions, phosphorus, coliforms, pathogenic bacteria, helminth eggs, sulphides, surfactants and organic micropollutants (diethylphthalate, bis(2ethylhexyl) phthalate and bisphenol A). Even with short hydraulic retention times in each pond (2 to 6 days), the results endorse the good capacity for organic matter and ammonia removal and excellent removal of coliforms, helminth eggs and sulphides. Removal of phosphorus, surfactants and selected micropollutants was limited. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available