4.6 Article

Contaminant removal efficiency depending on primary treatment and operational strategy in horizontal subsurface flow treatment wetlands

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 372-380

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.12.011

Keywords

Constructed wetlands; Reed beds; Design; Anaerobic digester; Intermittent feeding

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Science [CTM2008-06676-C05-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the contaminant removal efficiency of shallow horizontal subsurface flow treatment wetlands (SSF TWs) as a function of (1) primary treatment (hydrolytic upflow sludge blanket (HUSB) reactor vs. conventional settling) and (2) operation strategy (alternation of saturated/unsaturated phases vs. permanently saturated). An experimental plant was constructed, operated and surveyed for the main water quality parameters over a period of 2.5 years. The plant had 3 treatment lines: a control line (settler-wetland permanently saturated), a batch line (settler-wetland operated with saturated/unsaturated phases) and an anaerobic line (HUSB reactor-wetland permanently saturated). In each line wetlands had a surface area of 2.80 m(2), a water depth of 25 cm and a granular medium D-60 = 7.3 mm, and were planted with common reed. During the study period the wetlands were operated at a hydraulic and organic load of 28.5 mm/d and about 4.7 g BOD/m(2) d, respectively. Effluent average redox potential was lower for the anaerobic line (-45 +/- 78 mV) than for the other two lines (3 +/- 92.7 and -5 +/- 71 mV for control and batch, respectively). Overall, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and ammonium mass removal efficiencies were slightly greater for the batch line (88%, 96% and 87%, respectively) than for the control line (83%, 94% and 80%) and the anaerobic line (80%, 87% and 73%). During cold seasons, COD and ammonium removal in the batch line was around 30% and 50% higher than in the control line, respectively. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of a HUSB reactor as primary treatment did not enhance the treatment capacity of the system (in comparison with a conventional settler). The efficiency of treatment wetland systems with horizontal subsurface flow can be improved using a batch operation strategy. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available