Journal
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 47-61Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.008
Keywords
Root-reinforcement; Monte Carlo simulation; Fiber-bundle model; Slope stability; Streambank stability
Funding
- USDA Agricultural Research Service [58-6408-8-321]
- University of Mississippi
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper uses sensitivity analysis and a fiber-bundle model (FBM) to examine assumptions underpinning root-reinforcement models. First, different methods for apportioning load between intact roots were investigated. Second, a Monte Carlo approach was used to simulate plants with heartroot, plateroot and taproot/herringbone networks growing on slopes and floodplains. Results suggest that: 1. The commonly adopted value (1.2) for a term accounting for initial root orientation, shear distortion angle and soil friction angle is too large and is only attained for friction angles >35 degrees; 2. to obtain the correct dynamics. equal load apportionment must be used in FBMs; 3. root architecture has a significant impact on loading curve shape and the peak load supported by a root bundle; and 4. plants with different root architectures are suitable for stabilizing different features (for example, 500 Eastern Sycamore roots of differing network types provided median reinforcement of 4.86-15.08 kPa on a slope and 9.49-14.82 kPa on a floodplain). These latter variations, and the duration and displacement over which reinforcement is provided, are controlled by the proportions of compressed and tensioned roots as soil shearing initiates. Root-reinforcement may vary dramatically dependent upon the location of a plant relative to a failing soil mass. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available