4.6 Article

Effects of plant diversity on biomass production and substrate nitrogen in a subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages 1307-1313

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.007

Keywords

Functional group; Nutrient retention; Productivity; Species richness; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [30870235]
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most biodiversity experiments have been conducted in grassland ecosystems with nitrogen limitation, while little research has been conducted on relationships between plant biomass production, substrate nitrogen retention and plant diversity in wetlands with continuous nitrogen supply. We conducted a plant diversity experiment in a subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland for treating domestic wastewater in southeastern China Plant aboveground biomass production ranged from 20 to 3121 g m(-2) yr(-1) across all plant communities In general, plant biomass production was positively correlated with species richness (P=0.001) and functional group richness (P= 0.001). Substrate nitrate concentration increased significantly with increasing plant species richness (P= 0 046). but not with functional group richness (P= 0 550) Furthermore, legumes did not affect biomass production(P= 0 255), retention of substrate nitrate (P= 0.280) and ammonium (P= 0.269). Compared to the most productive of the corresponding monocultures, transgressive overyielding of mixed plant communities did not occur in most polycultures. Because greater diversity of plant community led to higher biomass production and substrate nitrogen retention, thus we recommend that plant biodiversity should be incorporated in constructed wetlands to Improve wastewater treatment efficiency. (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available