4.6 Article

The effect of root architecture on the shearing resistance of root-permeated soils

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 813-826

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.003

Keywords

Root architecture; Bioengineering; Root-permeated soils; In situ shear tests; Shear strength

Funding

  1. National Science Council in Taiwan [NSC 96-2221-E-327-023, 97-2221-E327-030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to Investigate the effect of the root architecture on the shear strength increment provided by plant roots in the soil In situ shear tests were conducted for this purpose. Five plant species - Hibiscus tiliaceus L. (Linden hibiscus). Mallotus japonicus (Thunb.)Muell.-Arg.(Japanese Mallotus),Sapium sebiferum (L.) Roxb (Chinese tallow tree). Casuarina equisetifolia L. (ironwood), and Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) (white popinac) - were used in this study Tensile tests on roots of various diameters and surveys on the root system structure were carried out for each of the plant species tested. The shear strength increments (Delta S) provided by the roots of Linden hibiscus, Japanese Mallows, Chinese tallow tree, ironwood, and white popinac were 0 34t(R), 0.462t(R), 0.688t(R). 0.34t(R), and 0.87t(R). respectively, when t(R) was estimated on the basis of the tensile root strength crossing through the shear plane. The shear strength increment provided by plant roots with conspicuous oblique and vertical roots was greater than that of root structures in which lateral roots were dominant In comparison with other types of root architecture, the R-type root architecture was found to be the most effective root system against shear failure in the soil Its shear strength increment was slightly greater than that with the V-type root architecture, followed by the VH-type root architecture The shear strength increment provided by plants with the H-type root architecture Was less effective than that contributed by plant species with other types of root architecture. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available