4.6 Article

Determinants of seed bank dynamics of two dominant helophytes in a tidal salt marsh

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 800-809

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.004

Keywords

Dispersal; Plant invasion; Scirpus mariqueter; Seed bank; Spartina alterniflora

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB403305]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [30670330]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [105063]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai [07dz12038, 20050246013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated dynamics and spatial distribution of Scirpus mariqueter and Spartina alterniflora seed banks at Chongming Dongtan in the Yangtze River estuary, China. Five sites along an elevational gradient were chosen, one in each of the main zones (mudflat, Scirpus monoculture, Scirpus-Spartina mixture, Spartina monoculture and Spartina-Phragmites mixture). Three surveys were performed just after seed rain, before germination and after germination, respectively During the period of November 2005 to May 2006, soil seed density of Scirpus mariqueter declined by 36%, and that of Spartina alterniflora by 58%. The spatial distributions of their seed banks were also different. Soil seed density of Scirpus mariqueter was not determined directly by seed production, but positively correlated with total aboveground biomass of the whole plant community. On the contrary, soil seed density of Spartina alterniflora just after seed rain (November) was significantly correlated with seed production, but had a poor relationship with the community's aboveground biomass. Our results indicated that other factors such as tidal movement might have had great influence on dispersal of Scirpus mariqueter, which would also affect its population dynamics. The understanding of this process can help us improve the conservation and restoration efforts. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available