4.6 Article

Effects of vegetation, limestone and aeration on nitritation, anammox and denitrification in wetland treatment systems

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 836-842

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.003

Keywords

Aeration; Anammox; Constructed wetland; Denitrification; Limestone; Nitritation; Nitrogen; Vegetation

Funding

  1. SUNY-ESF
  2. ERFEG
  3. SUNY-ESF Ecological Engineering
  4. United States Environmental Protection Agency [SU83391001-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integration of partial nitrification (nitritation) and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in constructed wetlands creates a sustainable design for nitrogen removal. Three wetland treatment systems were operated with synthetic wastewater (60 mg NH3-NL-1) in a batch mode of fill - 1-week reaction - drain. Each treatment system had a surface flow wetland (unplanted, planted, and planted plus aerated, respectively) with a rooting substrate of sandy loam and limestone pellets, followed by an unplanted subsurface flow wetland. Meanwhile, three surface flow wetlands with a substrate of sandy loam and pave-stone were operated in parallel to the former surface flow wetlands. Influent and effluent were monitored weekly for five cycles. Aeration reduced nitrogen removal due to hindered nitrate reduction. Vegetation maintained pH near neutral and moderate dissolved oxygen, significantly improved ammonia removal by anammox, and had higher TN removal due to coexistence of anammox and denitrification in anaerobic biofilm layers. Nitrite production was at a peak at the residence time of 4-5 d. Relative to pavestone, limestone increased the nitrite mass production peak by 97%. The subsurface flow wetlands removed nitrogen via nitritation and anammox, having an anammox activity of up to 2.4 g N m(-3) d(-1) over a startup operation of two months. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available