4.6 Article

Effects of faecal sludge application on growth characteristics and chemical composition of Echinochloa pyramidalis (Lam.) Hitch. and Chase and Cyperus papyrus L.

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 233-242

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.08.007

Keywords

Antelope grass; Constructed wetlands; Cyperus papyrus; Echinochloa pyramidalis; Faecal sludge; Growth characteristics; Nutrient contents; Planted drying beds; Sludge dewatering beds; Vertical-flow constructed wetlands

Funding

  1. Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  3. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
  4. International Foundation for Science (IFS, Sweden) [W/4115-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The yard-scale dewatering experiments conducted in Cameroon aimed at studying the effects of faecal sludge (FS) on growth characteristics of Echinochloa pyramidalis and Cyperus papyrus. After 6 months of gradually increasing the FS loading, the dewatering beds were batch-fed once a week for another 6 months with FS at 100, 200 and 300 kg TS/(m(2) year) during which several morphological plant parameters were weekly monitored. Plant growth was stimulated by sludge flooding. However, E. pyramidalis grew sturdier with increasing FS concentration, whereas C. papyrus tended to develop its below-ground plant parts. At least 150 and 20 dry tons/(ha year) of above-ground biomass, and 30 and 80 dry tons/(ha year) of below-ground biomass could be harvested for E. pyramidalis and C. papyrus, respectively. This harvest corresponds to a removal of at least 366 g N and 97 g P/m(2) for the antelope grass, and to at least 289 g N and 73 g P/m(2) for the papyrus. Extensive rhizome growth, and weak and slow culm regrowth were identified as potential factors limiting the use of C. papyrus for FS dewatering. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available