4.7 Article

Predicting land use allocation in France: A spatial panel data analysis

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 114-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.009

Keywords

Land use share model; Spatial autocorrelation; Panel data; Prediction

Funding

  1. AgFood-Trade-New Issues in Agricultural, Food and Bioenergy Trade [212036]
  2. European Commission
  3. French National Agency of Research (ANR) through the ModULand project Land use: models, dynamics and decisions [ANR2011 BSH1 005 02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictions of future land use areas are an important issue as land use patterns significantly impact environmental conditions (biodiversity, water pollution, soil erosion, and climate change) as well as economic and social welfare. In order to improve the prediction accuracy of aggregated land use share models, we propose in this paper a methodological contribution by controlling for both unobserved individual heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation. Our model is a land use shares model applied to aggregated data in France. Our data-set is a panel which covers both time series observations from 1992 to 2003 and cross-sectional observations by Departement (equivalent to NUTS3 regions). We consider four land use classes: (1) agriculture, (2) forest, (3) urban and (4) other use. We investigate the relation between the areas in land in different alternative uses and economic and demographic factors influencing land use decisions. Based on the comparison of prediction accuracy of different model specifications, our findings are threefold: First, controlling for both unobserved individual heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation outperforms any other specification in which spatial autocorrelation and/or individual heterogeneity are ignored. Second, accounting for cross-equation correlations does not seem to improve the prediction performances and finally, ignoring individual heterogeneity introduces substantial loss in prediction accuracy. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available