4.7 Article

Productivity growth and environmental regulations - accounting for undesirable outputs: Analysis of China's thirty provincial regions using the Malmquist-Luenberger index

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 70, Issue 12, Pages 2369-2379

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.019

Keywords

Undesirable outputs; Directional distance function; Total factor productivity (TFP); Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) productivity index; Environmental regulations; Uncontrollable variables

Funding

  1. Foundation for Youth Scholars
  2. Ministry of Education of China [08JC790045, 09YJC790118]
  3. Special Foundation for Chinese Postdoctoral Science [200902493]
  4. Jilin University
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper employs the Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) productivity index to evaluate China's growth in total factor productivity (TFP), incorporating undesirable outputs, during the period from 1989 to 2008. The ML productivity index and its components (technical and efficiency changes) are derived from the directional distance function which gives credit for an increase in good outputs and for reductions in undesirable outputs. The average annual ML productivity growth, accounting for undesirable outputs, is 2.46%, whereas the value of the traditional Malmquist productivity index is 4.84%, showing that the true TFP growth in China is overestimated if undesirable outputs are ignored. We explore the strictness in enforcing environmental regulations and its impact on improvements in ML productivity. The results show that, the enforcement of environmental regulations in China is, in general, far below the levels achieved in the best performing regions, and that the more stringent enforcement of environmental regulations would help to improve ML productivity growth in China. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available