4.7 Article

Valuing the environmental externalities of oasis farming in Left Banner, Alxa, China

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 69, Issue 11, Pages 2151-2157

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.019

Keywords

Monetary valuation; Environmental externalities; Oasis farming; Integrated economic and; biophysical modelling; Water pricing; Best management practices

Funding

  1. Australian Centre of International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) [LWR/2003/039]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), UK [NE/G008]
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) [ARCLP100100546]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [ESPA010001] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [ESPA010001] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agriculture's environmental footprint is expanding and one of its most critical impacts in China is the over-exploitation of surface water and groundwater from aquifers. This study investigated an approach for estimating the physical dimensions of the environmental externalities from a maize cropping system in oasis farming of the arid north-west of China, and the monetary valuation of these environmental externalities based on integrated process-based biophysical and economic models. The simulation results show that current farming practices cause 7854 Yuan/ha of groundwater recharge cost, 7696 Yuan/ha of water treatment cost, and 91 Yuan/ha of N2O mitigation cost. These costs lead to a social benefit-cost ratio of only 0.55, although the farmers' benefit-cost ratio was 1.85. A combination of adoption of recommended best management practices by farmers, and an increase in the water price to 1.1 Yuan/m(3) could maintain both the social and farmers' benefit-cost ratios above 1, but the costs of recharging groundwater were large in all cases. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available