4.7 Article

Detecting the 'conservation effect' on the maintenance of natural capital flow in different natural parks

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages 1115-1123

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.006

Keywords

Natural capital; Environmental management; Conservation policy

Funding

  1. Province of Lecce
  2. management authority of Torre Guaceto

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identification of areas worthy of protection and their subsequent institution as natural parks are instruments that society uses to preserve biodiversity that, by supporting Natural Capital Flow (NCF), represents a guarantee for the maintenance of human life quality. However, the implemented strategies for the conservation of biodiversity may differ from those adopted for the maintenance of natural capital: consequently, planning for natural capital might require a different strategy from that used in conservation policies The aim of this paper is to assess the 'conservation effect' of different conservation policies on the maintenance of NCF in three natural parks in Apulia Region (southern Italy). The assessment of natural capital flow variation has been carried out investigating the temporal dynamics of land-use/land-cover mosaics, and using Costanza et al's economic coefficients as surrogates of NCF. Results showed that not all environmental conservation management strategies have played an equal role in fostering NCF This research highlights that the recognition of the natural value of a site according to the European Directives (e g NATURA 2000 network) is not sufficiently effective for the conservation of the NCF, while It is necessary to identify a management authority that can appropriately drive landscape transformations, and sets, if necessary, the appropriate limitations. In addition, the management of these areas as part of a network of natural parks seems to be more effective for the maintenance of NCF. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available