4.7 Article

Analysis of the major drivers of the ecological footprint using the STIRPAT model and the PLS method-A case study in Henan Province, China

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 68, Issue 11, Pages 2818-2824

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.012

Keywords

EF; Drivers; STIRPAT; PLS; Henan Province

Funding

  1. 100 Talents Programme of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Taking Henan Province of China as an example, we computed and analyzed the ecological footprint (EF) in 1983-2006. The results showed that the EF in Henan Province quadrupled in the 23 years, but its ecological carrying capacity (EC) was rather low and was in a state of slow decline, indicating that Henan's ecological deficit (ED) had become a remarkable social problem. Therefore, the major drivers of the EFs change were analyzed. According to the simulations with STIRPAT model. the major drivers of Henan's EF were human population (P), GDP per capita (A(1)), quadratic term of GDP per capita (A(2)). percent of economy excluded in the service sector (Ta-1) and percent of urban population (Tb-1). However, these drivers themselves had strong collinearity, which might produce some uncertain impact to the final results. In order to avoid the impact of collinearity, the method of partial least squares (PLS) was used. The results showed that the major drivers of EF were P, A(1), A(2) and Tb-1. Ta-1 was excluded. Compared with the results by the STIRPAT model, which showed that P is the most dominant driver and the effect of the other drivers could almost be ignored, the results by PLS method were considered as more reasonable and acceptable because the impacts of the A (Affluence) and T (Technology) conditions to the regional EF were still too important to be ignored. In addition, the results acquired by both methods showed that the curvilinear relationship between economic development and ecological impact (EF) or the classical EKC hypothesis didn't exist in Henan Province. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available