4.4 Article

A framework for assessing the scale of influence of environmental factors on ecological patterns

Journal

ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 151-156

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.10.005

Keywords

Environmental factors classification; Cluster analysis; Ecological patterns; Spatial autocorrelation analyses; Spatial structure; Ecological models

Categories

Funding

  1. FCT (Portuguese Science Foundation) [SFRH/BD/40668/2007]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/40668/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of living organisms, habitats and ecosystems is primarily driven by abiotic environmental factors that are spatially structured. Assessing the spatial structure of environmental factors, e.g., through spatial autocorrelation analyses (SAC), can thus help us understand their scale of influence on the distribution of organisms, habitats, and ecosystems. Yet SAC analyses of environmental factors are still rarely performed in biogeographic studies. Here, we describe a novel framework that combines SAC and statistical clustering to identify scales of spatial patterning of environmental factors, which can then be interpreted as the scales at which those factors influence the geographic distribution of biological and ecological features. We illustrate this new framework with datasets at different spatial or thematic resolutions. This framework is conceptually and statistically robust, providing a valuable approach to tackle a wide range of issues in ecological and environmental research and particularly when building predictors for ecological models. The new framework can significantly promote fundamental research on all spatially-structured ecological patterns. It can also foster research and application in such fields as global change ecology, conservation planning, and landscape management. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available