4.7 Article

Recent Bayesian stable-isotope mixing models are highly sensitive to variation in discrimination factors

Journal

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 1017-1023

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1890/09-2409.1

Keywords

assumptions; conservation; discrimination factor; management; MixSIR; mixing model; Puffinus mauretanicus; sensitivity analysis; SIAR; stable isotope; Sterna hirundo

Funding

  1. Atlantic Cooperative Wildlife Ecology Research Network (ACWERN)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable isotopes are now used widely in ecological studies, including diet reconstruction, where quantitative inferences about diet composition are derived from the use of mixing models. Recent Bayesian models (MixSIR, SIAR) allow users to incorporate variability in discrimination factors (Delta C-13 or Delta N-15), or the amount of change in either delta C-13 or delta N-15 between prey and consumer, but to date there has been no systematic assessment of the effect of variation in Delta C-13 or Delta N-15 on model outputs. We used whole blood from Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) and muscle from their common prey items (fish and euphausiids) to build a series of mixing models in SIAR (stable isotope analysis in R) using various discrimination factors from the published literature for marine birds. The estimated proportion of each diet component was affected significantly by Delta C-13 or Delta N-15. We also use recently published stable-isotope data on the reliance of critically endangered Balearic Shearwaters (Puffinus mauretanicus) on fisheries discards to show that discrimination factor choice can have profound implications for conservation and management actions. It is therefore crucial for researchers wishing to use mixing models to have an accurate estimate of Delta C-13 and Delta N-15, because quantitative diet estimates can help to direct future research or prioritize conservation and management actions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available